It’s sad that Lindsay and Paris are no longer besties.
Bern has stalled out. Quite a come-down from 2016.
A network that harangues about “political correctness” is not likely to interdict a culture of sexual harassment.
An illegal immigrant sleeps in the White House at least three nights each week.
If tariffs hit oxy, MAGAts would turn on Trump.
Foreign policy will be largely irrelevant this cycle except for the case of Russia. Gabbard won’t make any friends talking up peace with Assad.
The critique of liberalism is what brought Schmitt into play in the Telos circle. Which is what is appealing about Schmitt to the reactionary right.
It does help that Schmitt identifies the core weakness of liberalism when under threat: its allergic reaction to power disempowers it to defeat its enemies.
Schmitt was not anathema in an earlier era. Both Reinhart Koselleck and Jurgen Habermas cited his work positively. Allegedly, the publication of the English translation of the Struckturwandel book was delayed for years because of its Schmitt references, which were removed.
Schmitt became relevant in a different way post 9/11 with the rise of a new friend/foe distinction in the “war on terror” (i.e., the novel legal category of “enemy combatant”).